Seizure of private property without due process

The 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution include the right to not have property taken without due process and to not have your private property seized unless the legal facts can prove that it was used in the commission of a crime. The federal government, however, has been violating these principles for years through a program called civil asset forfeiture. This program allows law enforcement agents to seize property from individuals who are never even charged with a crime, let alone convicted. The Obama administration is planning to seize control of the Internet via a very secretive proposal. This is a very scary policy in and of itself because it takes power from the people and puts it into the hands of our politicians. It will lead to censorship, and we all know how corrupt our government can be. But this is about more than just censorship — this could literally destroy the internet and spark a global economic meltdown.

Failure of the government to provide “due process”

The right to due process is the noblest of legal concepts and is the cornerstone of our justice system. It’s a founding principle that dates back centuries. Due process signals that the government won’t simply haul someone away to jail without first giving them a chance to prove their innocence. In almost all instances, criminal charges are preceded by arrests, which are preceded by written police reports. A conviction is never final until it has been reviewed in an appellate court and affirmed by a higher authority. Let’s say you’re the kind of person who, when it comes to due process and the constitution and suchlike, thinks this sort of thing should be left to the courts. You’re not sure that what you do should be effectively regulated as “political expression”. So picking up a guitar in front of a tank and singing a song or performing an apt dramatic at an anti-capitalist demonstration is something you’d like to keep clear of government interference otherwise, it might all get a

On June 10, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Kentucky must provide a lawyer at the initial post-deprivation hearing to people whose assets worth more than $15,000 have been seized. The case is called Tyson Timbs v. Indiana.

Imprisonment without trial

Imprisonment without trial is a policy and practice whereby a person can be detained for an indefinite period of time without the right to appear before a judge or our system of justice. The most prominent examples of this are Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Bagram Airfield.

Prison without trial is a human rights issue. It is the prolonged, and arbitrary imprisonment of a person or group of people who have not been convicted of any crime, nor sentenced to any punishment by any judicial body. Prisoners may also be described as having find a layer detained without trial, and thus as having been held in preventive custody, rather than incarcerated after being tried and found guilty.

For a person who is being held in custody, the experience can be alarming, frightening, upsetting and disorienting. Being taken into unlawful detention and not understanding why or by whom can add to that feeling of helplessness. For the people behind bars, it is important for them to be aware of their rights.