Bracha Graber was a whistle-blower who exposed child protective services corruption. She exposed fraudulent paperwork and exposed the child protective services’ abuse of federal funding. The United States Government cannot stand for child protective services corruption and child protective services corruption . Luckily, she was able to expose the problem in time. This case is a wake-up call for all those who support the fight against child abuse. Read on to learn more about the corruption that allegedly occurred within the child protective services system.
Violation of due process
The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) is the legal basis for child protective services. It passed in 1988 and directs federal money to states and non-profits to prevent child abuse. It also mandates state implementation of child abuse laws and provides massive funding for child protective services programs. The goal of CAPTA was to reduce child abuse in America. If it had worked, fewer children would have ended up in foster care or be put up for adoption. Instead, the number of children in foster care and adopted was up for the next nine years. The reason is the proliferation of government programs that rely on child abuse and neglect.
First, CAPTA violates the rights of American citizens. In addition to removing a child from their parents without a court order, the government has no legal basis to remove the child without the consent of the parent. In addition, the parents are not given Miranda rights. Rather, guilt is determined by a preponderance of evidence. Moreover, CAPTA violates due process and child protective services corruption.
The practice of CAPTA has been exposed by a California politician. John Van Doorn, who exposed the illegal child abduction program, said the profits generated by the practice were too good to be ignored. This is exactly what happened in this case and should be stopped. And it will not be the last. The public’s right to know the truth is the only way to ensure that children are safe in America.
Children and place them into foster care
CAPTA funding is a relatively small amount, compared to the federal funds that are used to support foster care and adoption. In fiscal year 2016, CAPTA funds made up less than three percent of the total federal funding for child welfare. This funding includes community-based child abuse prevention grants and state grants for improving CPS. In fiscal year 2019, CAPTA grants totaled $158 million.
While child savers rarely discuss CAPTA, they do make false statements about the bill. The CAPTA mentality has poisoned the field. It was passed by denying the connection between child maltreatment and poverty. Repealing CAPTA would be a significant step in reversing course in the field. Here are some things to consider when working to repeal CAPTA:
The new legislation allows states to use Title IV-E funds for prevention services and programs. Under the Act, states can use these funds only for those services or programs that are evidence-based. In order to qualify for this funding, a state must submit a Prevention Plan approved by the federal government. This is a positive first step in changing this funding situation. Title IV-E funds cover 90 percent of the budget of the Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACF). CAPTA opens the door to federal funding for states to take children and place them into foster care.
The CAPTA is one of the first steps in the process of ensuring that every child in the foster care system has a home. Many foster parents find it difficult to find permanent placements for their children because of the stigma they carry. However, it’s important to remember that foster care children face a social capital deficit. Fortunately, there are many willing people in America to help these children. Increasing opportunities for these children should be a priority for civil society and the government.